If you get a chance or you haven’t already, you should watch the best shooter in college basketball, Caitlin Clark. This young lady is spectacular and has been great for women’s basketball overall, not just college basketball. Caitlin Clark has the potential to be one of the greatest ever due to her incredible range and handling, reminiscent of Steph Curry.

Caitlin Clark says it's hard to wrap her head around being called NCAA Div.  I top scorer | KLRT - FOX16.com

Caitlin Clark’s journey is a story of exceptional talent and hard work. Born in Des Moines, Iowa, Caitlin grew up in a sports-loving family and quickly showed her prowess on the basketball court. From standing up to bullies at the age of five to leading her high school team with record-breaking performances, Caitlin’s determination was evident. In college, she made an immediate impact at the University of Iowa, setting multiple records and earning numerous accolades, including being the first Division I player to record consecutive 30-point triple-doubles and leading Iowa to the national championship game.

Off the court, Caitlin’s popularity soared. Her social media following grew, she threw the first pitch for the Iowa Cubs, and her trading cards sold for record-breaking amounts. She signed significant NIL deals with brands like Nike, State Farm, and Gatorade, making her a millionaire even before entering the WNBA. Caitlin Clark’s story is a testament to her hard work, resilience, and unwavering spirit, inspiring many and marking her as a future star in basketball.

However, Caitlin’s success has also sparked controversy and fear within the WNBA. Many see her as a threat to the status quo, and former WNBA MVP Cheryl Swoopes has already begun to discredit her achievements. On the Gilbert Arenas podcast, Swoopes falsely claimed that Caitlin had an extra year of college to break records and exaggerated the number of shots she takes per game. In reality, Caitlin has played only four years and averages just under 20 shots per game, debunking Swoopes’ assertions.

This smear campaign suggests a deeper anxiety within the WNBA about Caitlin Clark’s impending arrival. Caitlin’s immense popularity is expected to draw unprecedented crowds to WNBA games, potentially overshadowing current players. Her significant endorsement deals and marketability add to the tension, as many current WNBA players lack similar recognition and opportunities.

Caitlin Clark’s entry into the WNBA is likely to disrupt existing dynamics, creating friction among players. As a straight, Catholic woman, she may face hostility from some players and sections of the media who may not align with her personal beliefs and background. Jason Whitlock has speculated that Caitlin might encounter racism and hostility from some players due to her star status and different demographic profile.

Despite these challenges, the WNBA needs Caitlin Clark. The league, which has struggled with viewership and attendance, stands to benefit immensely from her presence. Caitlin’s ability to draw fans, secure endorsements, and generate media interest could revitalize the WNBA, making it more popular and profitable.

In conclusion, Caitlin Clark’s extraordinary talent and marketability have positioned her as a game-changer for women’s basketball. While her arrival in the WNBA may cause friction and controversy, it also presents an unparalleled opportunity for the league to grow and thrive. As Caitlin Clark continues to break records and captivate audiences, she remains a beacon of inspiration and a testament to the power of hard work and determination.