Dan Patrick recently revealed some startling insights about how the WNBA has seemingly set up Caitlin Clark for failure, despite her undeniable greatness. Despite facing immense challenges, Clark has proven her mettle and emerged as a standout player, making the Rookie of the Year race unexpectedly close.

Caitlin Clark has been nothing short of historic in her performance. During her college career, she broke Pistol Pete’s long-standing record of 3,667 points, becoming the all-time leading scorer in men’s and women’s Division 1 basketball history. Transitioning to the WNBA, Clark continued to achieve remarkable feats.

Against the New York Liberty, she recorded 19 points, 12 rebounds, 13 assists, and two steals, becoming the first WNBA rookie to record a triple-double and the first in Fever franchise history to do so.

Clark’s playmaking skills have left many, including Dan Patrick, in awe. Leading all rookies in scoring and assists, and ranking third in the league in assists, she is on track to break the all-time rookie record of 7.5 assists per game.

Despite the WNBA’s challenging schedule and initial setbacks, Clark has shown resilience, rallying her team from a poor start to climb up the rankings.

The WNBA’s attempt to capitalize on her popularity by giving her a tough early schedule led to some struggles, but Clark’s performance has been nothing short of phenomenal. She became the fastest WNBA rookie to surpass 100 points and 50 assists in just eight games.

Despite facing tough competition and physical play, she continues to shine, demonstrating her ability to excel under pressure.

However, Clark’s impressive achievements have been met with scrutiny. Some argue that her greatness was expected, while others highlight Angel Reese’s unexpected success as a reason she should win Rookie of the Year. This narrative has created a debate, with some claiming that the WNBA is trying to diminish Clark’s accomplishments to promote other players.

Angel Reese has had an impressive rookie season, recording consecutive double-doubles and setting new records.

Her team’s support and the media’s focus on her double-double streak have added to the debate. Yet, despite Reese’s achievements, many believe that Clark’s overall impact and performance make her the clear choice for Rookie of the Year.

The overwhelming fan support for Clark is evident in All-Star voting, where she and her Fever teammate Aaliyah Boston finished first and second, far ahead of others. This public recognition underscores her impact on the game and her popularity among fans.

Dan Patrick and other commentators argue that Clark’s consistent excellence, despite facing the toughest challenges, makes her the rightful Rookie of the Year.

They criticize the media narratives and double standards that seem to downplay her achievements. Clark’s ability to rise above these challenges and continue to excel proves her greatness.

As the season progresses, it is clear that Caitlin Clark has etched her name in WNBA history. Her resilience, playmaking, and scoring ability make her a standout player and the undeniable Rookie of the Year.

Despite any media narratives or double standards, Clark’s impact on the game and her potential for future greatness are unquestionable. The debate should recognize her achievements and acknowledge her as the deserving winner of the Rookie of the Year award.